Red Sox Chick/Toeing the Rubber

Because you always need a backup plan

Who’s number one?

Keep the faith, peeps! (Photo courtesy of Kelly O'Connor and used with permission)

Well at least no one can complain about Big Papi.

One of the things that kept coming up the most last night was in regard to John Lackey.  (Which I have no argument with right now.  He did not look good at all last night.  Of course, Jon Lester looked like crap on Friday but gets the free pass from most because “It’s April” but that’s for a whole other rant.)  Now, he was bad last night.  No way to sugar coat it.  But many people wrote that he isn’t a number two starter (many 9 year-olds might disagree).  So it got me to thinking about the purpose of labeling your pitchers by the order in which they start.  I’m not really getting how this would, ultimately, be all that important to any part of the game except the pitcher’s psyche.

I know it’s a big deal to be told you’re the number one guy.  Pitching on Opening Day is a tremendous honor and a badge of pride that your manager considers you the best in the rotation.  What I don’t get is anything after that.  I mean think about it.  With scheduled days off, rainouts and rotation juggling when the team goes against another team with big guns in their rotation, the order in which pitchers are placed really seems meaningless to me.

This isn’t to criticize those who were wondering why Lackey is number two.  Because, frankly, I had it in my head up until probably Thursday that Clay Buchholz would be pitching last night (and then pitching on Opening Day at Fenway).  So I was as baffled as anyone that Terry Francona put Lackey in the two spot.  But reflecting on my own feelings is also how I come to ask the question about the importance. Aside from POSSIBLY a win last night (which I’m not prepared to state as fact given how things have gone this weekend) what would the difference have been between putting Clay on the mound Saturday and Lackey on the mound Sunday?  Especially in the opening days of the season, would it be that big a difference between Lackey losing yesterday or today?

I just think placement for specific games is more important than the “official” spot in the rotation.  Man, I don’t care if Lackey is number two or number five, I just want him to pitch well.  (The same goes for the rest of them.)  I certainly think Lester earned the nod on Friday as a sign of respect for what he accomplished last year but it doesn’t matter to me if he starts the rotation or follows someone else because, frankly, the only time being first mattered was Friday.

The next time the order of the rotation will mean anything is when the playoffs begin. I’m willing to through caution to the wind until then.


April 3, 2011 - Posted by | 2011 | , , , , ,


  1. Arranging a pitching rotation successfully against competition, over the course of 162 games, some of which are on the road, days and nights is to say we will all win the lottery if only we pick the right numbers, months in advance of actually plunking down the cash for the ticket.

    Our first two goes in the new season had the offense, specifically one Mr. Gonzalez living up to the hype the media heaped on him, while Mr. Crawford is getting raised eyebrows from the same crowd. Gee, that’s new, right?

    There’s something to be said about the Sox starting pitching, which is, both guys were lousy. but there’s also something to be said about the Texas bop, which is not to be taken lightly; they’re really good and showed that the slightest mistake a pitcher makes, they’ll jump all over.

    It’s too early in the season, but I know that Lackey and Lester (sounds like an ambulance chaser law firm, doesn’t it?), will turn in good performances, and so will Crawford… 50 ~ 50 ~ 62

    Comment by Tru | April 3, 2011 | Reply

  2. Agreed. If we can’t get two out of three against woeful Cleveland, then I start to panic. Getting smacked around by good hitters, while not preferable to getting them out, is nothing to be ashamed of. Good hitters hit you because they are good. That being said, I’m not sure I trust Lackey to beat anybody right now.

    Comment by Michael | April 3, 2011 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: